Archive for December, 2009

Technology and Life Settlements

The Life Settlement Industry is rapidly growing and constantly developing. Witness the attention that the industry gets from legislators, the insurance companies and the media. As the industry continues to develop, technology will play a major role in shaping the industry. Consumers, brokers and providers all heavily rely on technology to make business decisions.

There are many software applications available for consumers to help them decide if they should sell their life insurance policies. These applications help weigh the costs of keeping the policy against the benefits of selling it for cash. Also, many tools are available for consumers online to estimate how much a policy is worth. Technological resources help consumers make intelligent decisions and give them an additional perspective to agents’ opinions.

Life Settlement brokers also depend on technology in order to speed up case offers. These brokers have thousands of policies and software applications help brokers isolate policies that meet current market parameters. These software applications speed up the process of matching policies with investors’ preferences.

Software applications and proprietary technology are essential to life settlement companies. Some of them even develop in-house platforms to analyze policies and store data. Furthermore, companies’ platforms are often utilized to underwrite and price policies. Software applications are also essential for servicing tasks such as budgeting, analyzing premiums and monitoring cash in policies.

One of the requirements for future growth of the industry is the confidentiality and privacy of life insurance sellers’ personal information. Software applications used by life settlement companies provide security of information and peace of mind for consumers.

Technology in the life settlement industry will help speed up and automate the process of selling insurance policies. Efficiency will eventually lead to a more liquid and mature market where consumers can quickly take advantage of selling policies they no longer wish to keep.

For more information on consumer software see:

http://enews.penton.com/enews/trustsandestates/technologyreview_/2008_2_13_te/display

Implementing a Personal Health Record

We hear so much about healthcare reform and how it will potentially affect us as healthcare consumers. One particular area of concern is the management of a patient’s personal health record. Most of us just do not have the time or energy to attempt to maintain a system to keep all of our health records up to date and ensure they are accurate. With today’s ever changing technology, the majority of physician’s offices and hospitals are now using Electronic Medical Record software programs that make the job of maintaining, storing and updating large amounts of information in a secure environment. The benefits to this are enormous as it can reduce the risk of medical errors, monitor disease processes, and communicate to a variety of healthcare providers as well as insurance carriers exactly what has been diagnosed, and the medical necessity for specific treatments and tests.

Along with healthcare facilities, it is a wise idea for individuals to maintain their own personal health record that they have access to in the privacy of their home, either in an online format, or in hard copies of records that have been obtained from a physician’s office. This may seem like a daunting task, however starting out in just small steps can pay off in the long term if a person finds the need to provide medical documentation for things such as health and life insurance applications. It is also a good idea to keep your personal health records available if you need to change physicians, or have been referred to or are consulting with another physician for a specific medical problem.

Implementing a personal health record (PHR) entails gathering as much information about your past and current health and organizing it in such a way that it can be easily retrievable and reproducible for circumstances that might require its use.

Maintaining a health record is a shared responsibility between the health-care provider and the health-care consumer. If you doubt that, try filling out a health insurance application without recorded health information to refer to.  Traditionally patients have relied upon their healthcare providers to know everything about them and to record that information, but in today’s era of change and looming healthcare reform, that approach is rapidly coming to an end. Just as taxpayers are held accountable for knowing and verifying the information they submit or the information that is submitted for them on their tax returns, healthcare consumers are going to be held more accountable for knowing and verifying what is in their medical record. This will be readily apparent if you have health insurance benefits excluded after your policy has gone into effect because of pre-existing conditions which were not recorded in the insurance application questionnaire at the time of filing.

In deciding whether or not to grant you coverage, insurance companies want to know a number of things about your past and current health such as past illnesses, current illnesses, dates of onset of symptoms, surgeries, past and present medications, allergies, immunizations and even some details about the health of family members that might have hereditary conditions that are significant to the person applying for coverage.

You may be able to obtain some of the relevant information from paper records you already have such as copies of superbills from doctor visits, a health diary, prescription receipts, prescription bottle labels or notes you may have taken during actual doctor visits. As you gather this information prior to applying for insurance, it is a good time to organize it for quick and easy reference for any future needs you may have in records to your personal health information.

It is unlikely that you will have all the information you need at your fingertips. It might be necessary to obtain some of the information from your health care provider(s). You have the right to access your health records. You may view or receive copies of your records, or instead request a summary of the information. Ask for an “authorization for the release of information” form. Complete the form and return it to the facility as directed. Most facilities do charge for copies. The fee can only include the cost of copying (including supplies and labor), as well as postage if you request the copy to be mailed. It can take up to 60 days to receive your medical records, so ask when you can expect to receive the information you requested. Do not be surprised if you meet some initial resistance to your request to view or obtain your records. First, as we know most doctors’ offices are overwhelmed and understaffed. More often than not, the person in charge of medical records has dozens of other requests ahead of yours so do not expect them to jump right on it! Another factor is often staff may regard your request as the potential for litigious intent on your part. It is a good idea to be specific in your reasons for your request and why you think having a personal health record would be of benefit to you as well as the healthcare provider. The healthcare provider will require that you sign an authorization form which is HIPAA compliant so that they are protected under federal law as it relates to the releasing of the patient’s personal health information.

Now is a good a time as any to begin organizing your health records. As we move forward in new directions in healthcare information and management, it is the wise consumer who takes an active role in their care and the information surrounding that care.               

C. Prince, LPN

Life Settlements: Quick and Interesting Facts

Some Interesting facts on Life Settlements:

  • The proceeds from the policy sales are often many times greater than the cash surrender value that would otherwise be offered by the insurance company.
  • The single most common reason for seeking a life settlement – representing 40% of all such transactions – is tied to the desire to obtain a different policy on more attractive terms.
  • In 2007 alone, life settlements provided seniors with $854 million in excess of cash surrender value.
  • 88% of all universal life policies never result in a death claim
  • A study published by Conning and Company, an insurance investment and research firm, found that more than 20% of the policies on insureds age 65 and over have a fair market value in excess of their cash surrender value.
  • Grigsby v. Russell, 222 U.S. 149, 156 (1911). Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in that case is notable for his statement that “[t]o deny the right to sell [a policy] . . . is to diminish appreciably the value of the contract in the owner’s hands.” Ibid.
  • Lapse rates for life insurance policies are remarkably high. According to a 2005 joint study sponsored by the Society of Actuaries and LIMRA International, nearly 40% of all individual life insurance policies lapse in the first 5 years. Another report in 2004 by a leading actuarial consulting firm found that, using recent industry levels of mortality and lapse experience, nearly 88% of universal life insurance policies and over 85% of term policies issued in the United States never result in a death claim. For policies issued to seniors at age 65, the corresponding percentages are 76% and 74%, respectively.
  • Viatical settlements are transactions similar to life settlements, but are intended for insureds who are chronically or terminally ill and have a life expectancy of generally less than 24 months. An additional 12 states regulate viatical settlements only. Since 2001, 13 states have enacted legislation regulating life settlements. As of the date of this publication, 14 states are considering legislation or regulations relating to life settlements.
  • According to the 2007 Life Insurers Fact Book, compiled by the American Council of Life Insurers, there was $10 trillion of individual life insurance in force on 160.5 million policies at the end of 2006. When individual life insurance is combined with group and credit life insurance, there was $19.1 trillion of life insurance in force on 374.5 million policies at the end of 2006.

Historical Overview of Life Settlements

In 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that life insurance policies are freely assignable for value. The court found that a life insurance policy is a form of property and that policy owners are free to sell and transfer ownership to other parties.

After World War II, the American economy and the insurance industry boomed. New forms of policies, such as universal life, became popular. Life insurance policies became a familiar consumer product – often purchased outright or incorporated into a corporate benefits package.

It wasn’t until the 1990s that a market for viatical settlements arose. Such settlements became a popular option for terminally or chronically ill policy owners who wanted to sell their policies to third-party investors. These policy owners often had HIV and needed the money for costly medication and treatment.

In the late 1990s, life settlements emerged from the viatical industry. Since then, the value and the volume of the life settlement industry have increased dramatically.